Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Sean&Steve or Sal&Rosey or Bury&Bloom or

Let's start with the premise that I really like Sean Salisbury. I like his passion and his personality. When he did some extensive guest host duties on ESPN1000 several months ago I thought it would be a terrific idea for him to continue on a more regular basis. Hence, when I heard that he was going to be the regular co-host for the new mid-day show from 9-12, with Steve Rosenbloom, I was pretty geeked about it. Today was their first day and I was all ready to listen.

Then came the first 20 minutes of the show. Sean was his usual bombastic self, only he committed possibly one of the worst crimes for a sports radio host - an unfamiliarity with the local market. Look, in order to have any credibility with a Chicago sports fan you have to at least understand what it means when your co-host refers in shorthand to the "2003 Choke." I'll admit, you had to be listening fairly closely to catch it, since he covered it up fairly well and then changed the course of the argument somewhat crudely.

Since I like Salisbury's style and delivery, I am willing to give him another chance (it is better to be interesting and dumb than boring and dumb, just ask the former tenant of the mid-day show). However, he is on a very short leash if he is going to continue to demonstrate a lack of knowledge about Chicago sports.

Best of luck Sean!

Monday, May 08, 2006

Be Still My Heart

Could it be true? Have my wishes finally come to fruition?

This morning the Chicago sports world is abuzz with the rumor that Dusty Baker may be headed out of Chicago with his tail between his legs. I wonder if his "Book of Managing", the one to which he refers for all his strategic decisions, has any rules for dealing with this scenario. The natives in the South America are celebrating since several acres of rainforest will be preserved now that Dusty will not need to chew on his silly sticks for a while.

Before you get the idea that I blame all of the Cubs' woes on Dusty, that is not my intent. Quite frankly, I think the laid back attitude which reportedly permeates their lockerroom is ridiculous in light of the latest performances on the field. Heck, they should all be forced to watch the previous day's game. Players need to be responsible for themseves, but sometimes someone has to hold them accountable.

But, Dusty is a "players' coach." Well, if a players' coach is a manager who does not make a player responsible for his own mental errors and lack of focus, then Dusty is definitely a players' coach. Ultimately, the manager is responsible for the attitude and preparation of the team, and Dusty clearly has allowed the ship to steer itself into the reef.

My early vote for the next manager of the Chicago National League Ball Club: Lou Piniella.

Please send in your suggestions for the Cubs' next manager.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Tuesday Morning Quarterback

This post is simply a referral to a column on Page 2 of ESPN.com. Several years ago a columnist named Gregg Easterbrook penned a weekly column - Tuesday Morning Quarterback - during the football season where he shed his unique perspective on the world of football (and anything else he found unusual or uncommon). Well, ESPN has finally welcomed him back! His first two return columns each relate to the NFL draft, but his regular feature will return in the fall. Anyway, I have added a link to his archive in case you want to sample some of his goodies (of course, only after you read the Random Thoughts!).

Monday, May 01, 2006

Bears Draft Recap

Well, as we sit at our desk's on the Monday after the draft the question in most people's minds, I imagine, is when did Danny Manning start playing football?

In all seriousness, I am interested in comparing the Bears' draft with the forecast I posted last week at this time. Before I begin, though, let me explain why this draft in particular will be very difficult to grade for several years. The pundits and fans like to assign grades to a draft based on the perception of how well as team helped itself - either by addressing a need or adding an explosive, "can't-miss" prospect. Well, how in the world do you do that if you don't believe any of the players the Bears selected will be a starter for at least 1-3 years? For the first time in my memory the Bears will not be plugging any of their draft picks into the regular rotation at any position (special teams excluded). So, as a result, I am placing my vote on a grade of "none of the above", but only because I cannot in good faith pass judgment without waiting 2-3 years to see what becomes of these young players.

Without further delay, here is my substantive recap....

Last week I said the Bears' biggest need was at safety and cornerback. Well, the Bears' appear to have agreed with me, only they are a little more confident in the status quo than I am. Hopefully, Mike Brown and Chris Harris will be healthy this year, but it does not seem likely that we will get a full season from Brown, who is hurt more frequently than Grossman but does not get half the flak. The Bears are unlikely to have Brandon McGowan at full speed until at least October and I have previously stated my reservations with relying on Todd Johnson.

Danieal Manning (pronounced Dan-yell) is supposed to have outstanding physical tools, but he is used to playing against sub-par competition. Devin Hester does not know which position he will end up playing. According to reports from the "U", he has such special speed that he is a threat to score whenever he touches the ball. I guess he could develop into a 2-way player in the mold of Deion, but that is asking way too much from him right now. In any event, I believe the Bears have indicated that he is going to principally be a back-up CB this year rather than a WR. I don't know, but if he is that much of a threat, I would want the ball in his hand more often than when the other team makes a mistake. All the same, he should at least help the Bears defend the faster receivers in the league (read: Steve Smith) once he develops more. So, the Bears did address their biggest need, but possibly will not see a return on their investment until next year.

The middle tier of my forecast identified 3 positions for which the Bears needed to add depth and one where they could plug in a starter if the right player was available. Well, consider the depth goal to have been met. The Bears selected a backup linebacker (4th Round) and offensive lineman (6th). Since both of these positions seem to be deep on this team, I am happy to give these players time to develop under veteran tutelage. Devin Hester, as I stated above, may even see some time at WR if he is given a chance to learn how to run routes accurately (a streak pattern is pretty easy to run I think). Unfortunately, the Bears still have not addressed the questions about their tight ends. This still seems to be a position which is crying out for more consistency and production.

Finally, the Bears addressed my lowest priorities by dedicating two of their picks to the defensive line. Well, at least it is consistent with my mantra that you have to build your team from the inside out. However, this is one area where I think the Bears missed an opportunity to fill a position that was more of a need. Maybe Dusty Dvoracek has stopped drinking and will eventually supplant the 3 veterans in front of him on the depth chart, but I do not find it very likely that he will see as much playing time as a new TE. When the Bears selected Dvoracek, Dominique Byrd (USC) and Dave Thomas (Texas) were still available. Even more frustrating, however, is that fact that Leonard Pope was picked with the immediately preceding pick. I would have happily forfeited one of our 6th round picks to move up one or two spots to be in a position to have selected Pope.

Overall, I am partially satisfied with the Bears draft. I do think they addressed some of their needs adequately. However, there is an old saying that holds if you stop getting better you must be getting worse. I am thrilled the Bears' were able to add depth at DB, LB, OL and DL, but I have a nagging feeling that they should have gotten some players who are more prepared to step in immediately to provide at least some competition for the regulars.

Note on Special Teams: It seems like the Bears placed a premium on their first two players because of their ability to contribute immediately on special teams. It sure is nice that neither will be dead weight on the depth chart while they continue to develop. However, special teams is a team-oriented part of the game which requires all of the players on each unit to be successful at their role for the team to reap rewards. It is very difficult for just one person to make an extraordinary difference if the blockers in front of him are bad or mistake prone. With the Bears' style of play emphasizing field position, I just hope that these guys deliver part of what their promise holds for them so that these picks appear to be wise ones next January.